Question: when a robot hurts someone, who answers for it? Surely not the robot itself. While it's entertaining to imagine a bot getting cross-examined in court, the disincentives of the justice system probably wouldn’t motivate a bad bot to do good.
Jokes aside, the question of liability is an interesting one. When robots advance to the point where they’re operating independently – especially if their skills are not hardwired, but learned – it’s a bit problematic to suppose that their actions are directly attributable to their maker.
Compare an autonomous robot to, say, a conventional blender. The blender does exactly what it was built to do, nothing more. If, in the course of normal use, it malfunctions, one can pretty easily pin the blame on the manufacturer.
Artificial intelligence, though, upsets that equation. The whole premise of machine learning is that the robot can acquire abilities it didn’t originally have. Can its actions still be pinned on the manufacturer at that point? Once it's left the nest, so to speak, a robot may be capable of things its manufacturer never had in mind.
Add to that, there probably isn't just one "manufacturer" to think about. Artificial intelligence is complex, building on multiple technologies that may originate from many different places. For example, if the technology stems from the open source community, it could have millions of creators. Would they all be liable for the robot’s actions? Only some? How to decide which ones?
Kate Brown, Senior Claims Expert at Swiss Re Corporate Solutions and a contributor at Risk & Insurance, suggested a few models to frame society’s response to robot-wreaked havoc:
Robot as employee
Robot as pet
Robot as individual
One thing is certain: we need a set of civil laws to govern the way we deal with autonomous robots and the harm they may cause.
Last year, the European Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs issued a motion calling for just that. “The EU report acknowledged that improvements in the autonomous and cognitive abilities of robots makes them more than simple tools, and makes the traditional rules on tort and contract liability inadequate,” Brown said.
For example, the EU proposed registering smart robots, imposing a code of ethics on robot manufacturers and researchers, and recognizing the robots themselves as “electronic persons” beholden to their own category of laws and regulations.
The EU is not the only entity turning wheels in that direction. Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry is drafting robot-related business and safety guidelines. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce also started looking at robotics, among other emerging technologies, recently.
“Someday, in the not too distant future, lawyers and experts in courtrooms around the world may discuss and debate what evidence is needed to demonstrate the proper programming of a robot,” Brown said.
Whether or not a bot will ever have to appear before a judge remains to be seen.
The FedNat Insured Web is a great tool for our insureds!
They like having a centralized location to view policy info, make payments, upload policy documents, and elect to become paperless to receive a discount.
The insureds also can file a First Notice of Loss for a claim and access exiting claim info. Silvervine recently enhanced the site which allows insureds to upload policy documents directly to their policy. The uploaded docs go directly into our workflows and save a lot of manual effort on our part.
From my visits with agents, the agents appreciate the app for the amount of time saved on having to download and attach photos directly to the policy.
The app can also reduce the amount of staff required for a busy office to fulfill underwriting requests for photos.
When training agents they are amazed at how quickly the photos attach directly to the policy. After taking photos using the app and before they make it back to their desk, the photo is already attached to the policy. They also like the ability to attach additional photos for pre-existing damage.
Customer Service is seeing an improvement with retention as the text message definitely triggers phone calls from insureds to make payments.
The insureds love the fact that we notify them on their phones because they state that sometimes they don’t receive their mail for various reasons.
The insureds are paying more attention to the texts then to their actual mail. We try to set all of our customers up on that option if we notice that they are not currently enrolled, as it builds great customer relations as well as retention.
As a company we have adopted the use of Policy Scan for all our policies, and our agents have adopted the use of the app as well.
Not only is it easy to use, there is also no more worrying about losing photos, having to store photos or photos being attached to the wrong policy.
With Policy Scan we have increased efficiency in our workflow and reduced our exposure on the risk.
Silvervine’s core administration solutions easily handles multiple carriers within multiple states, including accounting, payment processing, immediate policy issuance and endorsements.
What started out writing one product, one line in one state has now grown into mulitple products, multiple lines and writing in multiple states. We have over $95 million in annualized premium in-force and we expect to grow by 20% during the next year all serviced by Silvervine.
Silvervine was our insurance software system of choice when we started the company in 2006. Silvervine enabled us to begin business within a few months of licensing the company. Today, we are one of the top 20 homeowner’s writers in Texas and SIlvervine’s solutions have been an integral part of our success.